Editorial Team — AI Health Guide

Who we are

AI Health Guide is written and maintained by the AI Health Apps Editorial Team — health-tech researchers and writers who publish independent reviews of AI health and medical software for patients and clinicians. The team owns testing methodology, pricing verification, regulatory reporting, and publishing cadence. We use brand-level, role-based attribution rather than individual bylines.

What we are — and what we are not

The editorial team are not clinicians. We do not hold medical licences and we do not give clinical advice.

All clinical content on this site is reviewed by a licensed medical professional before publication. The reviewer's credentials and review date appear on every clinically-reviewed page. Where a page does not yet carry a clinician byline, the reviewer is still being onboarded — see our Medical Review Board page for the active roster.

Our editorial role: product testing, pricing verification, regulatory reporting (FDA AI/ML-enabled device list, HIPAA/BAA availability, state telehealth regulation), and sourcing discipline.

Editorial focus areas

AI medical scribes (Nuance DAX, Abridge, DeepScribe, Freed, Suki, Heidi, Nabla, Ambience)
AI diagnostic platforms (PathAI, Viz.ai, Aidoc, Tempus)
Consumer mental-health, fitness, nutrition apps
Digital therapeutics and FDA-cleared AI
EHR integration depth (Epic, Oracle/Cerner, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks)

How we evaluate AI health tools

The process we run for every review on this site:

Discover. Continuous review of the FDA AI/ML-enabled device list, KLAS Research, and industry trade press (Fierce Healthcare, Becker's Hospital Review, MobiHealthNews) for new entrants and changes to existing tools.
Test. For consumer tools that offer self-onboarding (free tiers, free trials, or recoverable paid trials), we sign up and exercise the core features, adding dated first-party field evidence to the review as it is captured. For B2B clinical software that requires health-system credentials, we substitute structured interviews with deployed clinicians plus KLAS data and vendor demos. Each review states which path applied.
Verify. Pricing checked against the vendor's current public pricing page on the date of publication. Clinical-evidence claims cite a specific peer-reviewed study with the PubMed / NEJM / JAMA URL. Regulatory claims cite the FDA, FTC, HHS, or state-AG page directly.
Publish. Clinical content routes to the Medical Review Board for sign-off before publish. Editorial-only content (pricing, feature matrices, EHR integration lists) ships without clinical review but is marked as such.
Refresh. Pricing re-verified quarterly. FDA clearance status checked monthly. Regulatory events (DOJ, FTC, HHS-OCR settlements affecting reviewed tools) reflected within 72 hours.

Hands-on testing status

First-party hands-on field evidence — dated signup walk-throughs and feature screenshots — is captured and published on individual reviews as it is completed. Reviews that have not yet been exercised hands-on rely on documented desk research, vendor demos, and, for B2B clinical software, structured interviews with deployed clinicians plus KLAS data, and each review says which path applied. We would rather mark a section "desk research" or "vendor demo only" than imply hands-on we have not done.

What you'll not find here

No paid placements. Vendors do not pay for inclusion or for ranking.
No vendor preview of reviews. Reviewed companies do not see drafts and do not edit copy.
No affiliate-driven ranking. Our affiliate commission rates do not influence the rank order in any guide or comparison. We publish the affiliate amount in /methodology/ where it has been disclosed.
No medical advice. Every clinical claim is reviewed by a licensed clinician but the site as a whole is informational, not a substitute for a clinician evaluating your specific case.

Editorial independence in practice

The most-asked question from the clinicians we interview: "what's the commercial relationship between your site and the vendors you review?" The answer is the same for every vendor: affiliate where the vendor has a program; otherwise no commercial relationship. Rankings are independent of commission. See /editorial-independence/ for the full statement.

Operator and legal entity

AI Health Guide is operated by a private individual based in Cyprus — not a company. Editorial and operator contact runs through [email protected]; see our imprint for the formal operator details and our privacy policy for the data controller and supervisory authority.

Corrections log

AI Health Guide is a new site (first public version 2026-04). Corrections will accumulate publicly. Every correction is recorded with the publish date of the original error, the date of correction, and the substance of the change. See our corrections policy for the procedure and the running log. If you spot something wrong, the fastest path is [email protected]; we acknowledge inside 48 hours.

Languages

The site is single-locale English-only. We don't translate clinical content because nuance translation errors in regulated health text are a real safety risk and translation oversight isn't a discipline we've built editorial capacity for yet.

How to verify

Editorial process: Editorial Guidelines
Independence statement: Editorial Independence
Fact-checking: Fact-Checking Policy
Corrections: Corrections Policy
Clinical reviewers: Medical Review Board
Operator and legal: Imprint